<code id='07BA0111DA'></code><style id='07BA0111DA'></style>
    • <acronym id='07BA0111DA'></acronym>
      <center id='07BA0111DA'><center id='07BA0111DA'><tfoot id='07BA0111DA'></tfoot></center><abbr id='07BA0111DA'><dir id='07BA0111DA'><tfoot id='07BA0111DA'></tfoot><noframes id='07BA0111DA'>

    • <optgroup id='07BA0111DA'><strike id='07BA0111DA'><sup id='07BA0111DA'></sup></strike><code id='07BA0111DA'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='07BA0111DA'><label id='07BA0111DA'><select id='07BA0111DA'><dt id='07BA0111DA'><span id='07BA0111DA'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='07BA0111DA'></u>
          <i id='07BA0111DA'><strike id='07BA0111DA'><tt id='07BA0111DA'><pre id='07BA0111DA'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / fashion / comprehensive

          comprehensive


          comprehensive

          author:comprehensive    Page View:9
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In