<code id='719D984A25'></code><style id='719D984A25'></style>
    • <acronym id='719D984A25'></acronym>
      <center id='719D984A25'><center id='719D984A25'><tfoot id='719D984A25'></tfoot></center><abbr id='719D984A25'><dir id='719D984A25'><tfoot id='719D984A25'></tfoot><noframes id='719D984A25'>

    • <optgroup id='719D984A25'><strike id='719D984A25'><sup id='719D984A25'></sup></strike><code id='719D984A25'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='719D984A25'><label id='719D984A25'><select id='719D984A25'><dt id='719D984A25'><span id='719D984A25'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='719D984A25'></u>
          <i id='719D984A25'><strike id='719D984A25'><tt id='719D984A25'><pre id='719D984A25'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / hotspot / leisure time

          leisure time


          leisure time

          author:focus    Page View:6
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In