<code id='EBBFE71D3B'></code><style id='EBBFE71D3B'></style>
    • <acronym id='EBBFE71D3B'></acronym>
      <center id='EBBFE71D3B'><center id='EBBFE71D3B'><tfoot id='EBBFE71D3B'></tfoot></center><abbr id='EBBFE71D3B'><dir id='EBBFE71D3B'><tfoot id='EBBFE71D3B'></tfoot><noframes id='EBBFE71D3B'>

    • <optgroup id='EBBFE71D3B'><strike id='EBBFE71D3B'><sup id='EBBFE71D3B'></sup></strike><code id='EBBFE71D3B'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='EBBFE71D3B'><label id='EBBFE71D3B'><select id='EBBFE71D3B'><dt id='EBBFE71D3B'><span id='EBBFE71D3B'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='EBBFE71D3B'></u>
          <i id='EBBFE71D3B'><strike id='EBBFE71D3B'><tt id='EBBFE71D3B'><pre id='EBBFE71D3B'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / hotspot / comprehensive

          comprehensive


          comprehensive

          author:leisure time    Page View:6
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In