<code id='158BC01E3E'></code><style id='158BC01E3E'></style>
    • <acronym id='158BC01E3E'></acronym>
      <center id='158BC01E3E'><center id='158BC01E3E'><tfoot id='158BC01E3E'></tfoot></center><abbr id='158BC01E3E'><dir id='158BC01E3E'><tfoot id='158BC01E3E'></tfoot><noframes id='158BC01E3E'>

    • <optgroup id='158BC01E3E'><strike id='158BC01E3E'><sup id='158BC01E3E'></sup></strike><code id='158BC01E3E'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='158BC01E3E'><label id='158BC01E3E'><select id='158BC01E3E'><dt id='158BC01E3E'><span id='158BC01E3E'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='158BC01E3E'></u>
          <i id='158BC01E3E'><strike id='158BC01E3E'><tt id='158BC01E3E'><pre id='158BC01E3E'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / fashion / knowledge

          knowledge


          knowledge

          author:hotspot    Page View:1892
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In