<code id='EDF9D10365'></code><style id='EDF9D10365'></style>
    • <acronym id='EDF9D10365'></acronym>
      <center id='EDF9D10365'><center id='EDF9D10365'><tfoot id='EDF9D10365'></tfoot></center><abbr id='EDF9D10365'><dir id='EDF9D10365'><tfoot id='EDF9D10365'></tfoot><noframes id='EDF9D10365'>

    • <optgroup id='EDF9D10365'><strike id='EDF9D10365'><sup id='EDF9D10365'></sup></strike><code id='EDF9D10365'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='EDF9D10365'><label id='EDF9D10365'><select id='EDF9D10365'><dt id='EDF9D10365'><span id='EDF9D10365'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='EDF9D10365'></u>
          <i id='EDF9D10365'><strike id='EDF9D10365'><tt id='EDF9D10365'><pre id='EDF9D10365'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / leisure time

          leisure time


          leisure time

          author:knowledge    Page View:19495
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In