<code id='BC4A9672CB'></code><style id='BC4A9672CB'></style>
    • <acronym id='BC4A9672CB'></acronym>
      <center id='BC4A9672CB'><center id='BC4A9672CB'><tfoot id='BC4A9672CB'></tfoot></center><abbr id='BC4A9672CB'><dir id='BC4A9672CB'><tfoot id='BC4A9672CB'></tfoot><noframes id='BC4A9672CB'>

    • <optgroup id='BC4A9672CB'><strike id='BC4A9672CB'><sup id='BC4A9672CB'></sup></strike><code id='BC4A9672CB'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='BC4A9672CB'><label id='BC4A9672CB'><select id='BC4A9672CB'><dt id='BC4A9672CB'><span id='BC4A9672CB'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='BC4A9672CB'></u>
          <i id='BC4A9672CB'><strike id='BC4A9672CB'><tt id='BC4A9672CB'><pre id='BC4A9672CB'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / fashion / knowledge

          knowledge


          knowledge

          author:explore    Page View:118
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In