<code id='4949C68CFC'></code><style id='4949C68CFC'></style>
    • <acronym id='4949C68CFC'></acronym>
      <center id='4949C68CFC'><center id='4949C68CFC'><tfoot id='4949C68CFC'></tfoot></center><abbr id='4949C68CFC'><dir id='4949C68CFC'><tfoot id='4949C68CFC'></tfoot><noframes id='4949C68CFC'>

    • <optgroup id='4949C68CFC'><strike id='4949C68CFC'><sup id='4949C68CFC'></sup></strike><code id='4949C68CFC'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='4949C68CFC'><label id='4949C68CFC'><select id='4949C68CFC'><dt id='4949C68CFC'><span id='4949C68CFC'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='4949C68CFC'></u>
          <i id='4949C68CFC'><strike id='4949C68CFC'><tt id='4949C68CFC'><pre id='4949C68CFC'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / knowledge

          knowledge


          knowledge

          author:leisure time    Page View:8
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In