<code id='BAC8888A15'></code><style id='BAC8888A15'></style>
    • <acronym id='BAC8888A15'></acronym>
      <center id='BAC8888A15'><center id='BAC8888A15'><tfoot id='BAC8888A15'></tfoot></center><abbr id='BAC8888A15'><dir id='BAC8888A15'><tfoot id='BAC8888A15'></tfoot><noframes id='BAC8888A15'>

    • <optgroup id='BAC8888A15'><strike id='BAC8888A15'><sup id='BAC8888A15'></sup></strike><code id='BAC8888A15'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='BAC8888A15'><label id='BAC8888A15'><select id='BAC8888A15'><dt id='BAC8888A15'><span id='BAC8888A15'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='BAC8888A15'></u>
          <i id='BAC8888A15'><strike id='BAC8888A15'><tt id='BAC8888A15'><pre id='BAC8888A15'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / entertainment / knowledge

          knowledge


          knowledge

          author:knowledge    Page View:76
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In