<code id='2F2E187333'></code><style id='2F2E187333'></style>
    • <acronym id='2F2E187333'></acronym>
      <center id='2F2E187333'><center id='2F2E187333'><tfoot id='2F2E187333'></tfoot></center><abbr id='2F2E187333'><dir id='2F2E187333'><tfoot id='2F2E187333'></tfoot><noframes id='2F2E187333'>

    • <optgroup id='2F2E187333'><strike id='2F2E187333'><sup id='2F2E187333'></sup></strike><code id='2F2E187333'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='2F2E187333'><label id='2F2E187333'><select id='2F2E187333'><dt id='2F2E187333'><span id='2F2E187333'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='2F2E187333'></u>
          <i id='2F2E187333'><strike id='2F2E187333'><tt id='2F2E187333'><pre id='2F2E187333'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / comprehensive

          comprehensive


          comprehensive

          author:hotspot    Page View:12
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In