<code id='D507EE3C27'></code><style id='D507EE3C27'></style>
    • <acronym id='D507EE3C27'></acronym>
      <center id='D507EE3C27'><center id='D507EE3C27'><tfoot id='D507EE3C27'></tfoot></center><abbr id='D507EE3C27'><dir id='D507EE3C27'><tfoot id='D507EE3C27'></tfoot><noframes id='D507EE3C27'>

    • <optgroup id='D507EE3C27'><strike id='D507EE3C27'><sup id='D507EE3C27'></sup></strike><code id='D507EE3C27'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='D507EE3C27'><label id='D507EE3C27'><select id='D507EE3C27'><dt id='D507EE3C27'><span id='D507EE3C27'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='D507EE3C27'></u>
          <i id='D507EE3C27'><strike id='D507EE3C27'><tt id='D507EE3C27'><pre id='D507EE3C27'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / hotspot

          hotspot


          hotspot

          author:fashion    Page View:8756
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In