<code id='68FF42B9BA'></code><style id='68FF42B9BA'></style>
    • <acronym id='68FF42B9BA'></acronym>
      <center id='68FF42B9BA'><center id='68FF42B9BA'><tfoot id='68FF42B9BA'></tfoot></center><abbr id='68FF42B9BA'><dir id='68FF42B9BA'><tfoot id='68FF42B9BA'></tfoot><noframes id='68FF42B9BA'>

    • <optgroup id='68FF42B9BA'><strike id='68FF42B9BA'><sup id='68FF42B9BA'></sup></strike><code id='68FF42B9BA'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='68FF42B9BA'><label id='68FF42B9BA'><select id='68FF42B9BA'><dt id='68FF42B9BA'><span id='68FF42B9BA'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='68FF42B9BA'></u>
          <i id='68FF42B9BA'><strike id='68FF42B9BA'><tt id='68FF42B9BA'><pre id='68FF42B9BA'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / hotspot / knowledge

          knowledge


          knowledge

          author:explore    Page View:2
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In