<code id='8340438805'></code><style id='8340438805'></style>
    • <acronym id='8340438805'></acronym>
      <center id='8340438805'><center id='8340438805'><tfoot id='8340438805'></tfoot></center><abbr id='8340438805'><dir id='8340438805'><tfoot id='8340438805'></tfoot><noframes id='8340438805'>

    • <optgroup id='8340438805'><strike id='8340438805'><sup id='8340438805'></sup></strike><code id='8340438805'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='8340438805'><label id='8340438805'><select id='8340438805'><dt id='8340438805'><span id='8340438805'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='8340438805'></u>
          <i id='8340438805'><strike id='8340438805'><tt id='8340438805'><pre id='8340438805'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / knowledge

          knowledge


          knowledge

          author:knowledge    Page View:596
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In