<code id='D0E2CD1DC1'></code><style id='D0E2CD1DC1'></style>
    • <acronym id='D0E2CD1DC1'></acronym>
      <center id='D0E2CD1DC1'><center id='D0E2CD1DC1'><tfoot id='D0E2CD1DC1'></tfoot></center><abbr id='D0E2CD1DC1'><dir id='D0E2CD1DC1'><tfoot id='D0E2CD1DC1'></tfoot><noframes id='D0E2CD1DC1'>

    • <optgroup id='D0E2CD1DC1'><strike id='D0E2CD1DC1'><sup id='D0E2CD1DC1'></sup></strike><code id='D0E2CD1DC1'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='D0E2CD1DC1'><label id='D0E2CD1DC1'><select id='D0E2CD1DC1'><dt id='D0E2CD1DC1'><span id='D0E2CD1DC1'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='D0E2CD1DC1'></u>
          <i id='D0E2CD1DC1'><strike id='D0E2CD1DC1'><tt id='D0E2CD1DC1'><pre id='D0E2CD1DC1'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / entertainment / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:Wikipedia    Page View:8291
          Peter Lee
          Microsoft's head of research Peter Lee speaking at STAT Breakthrough Summit in San Francisco. Sarah Gonzalez for STAT

          SAN FRANCISCO — Surging interest in generative AI among medical professionals since ChatGPT’s launch is perhaps a testament to its potential — but it could also lead clinicians, and patients to experiment with it before there is wider consensus on how to navigate its biases and other pitfalls, Microsoft’s head of research Peter Lee said Thursday at STAT’s Breakthrough Summit.

          About a month after OpenAI  — Microsoft has a significant financial stake in the company — launched its chatbot in 2022 on November 30, which happened to be Lee’s birthday, he got a note from a doctor friend who said he’d used it so his receptionist could file after-visit summaries for patients. While Lee and a handful of other doctors at Microsoft had been impressed with the GPT-4’s capabilities, they knew it had weaknesses.

          advertisement

          “The emotions were really mixed. I mean we were thrilled,” he said, but then “just within minutes there’s a feeling of dread. We had already come to the realization that GPT-4 would be prone to issues, issues of bias, hallucination, mathematical and logical errors,” he said. “And so, there’s an immediate question: ‘Should we allow this to happen?’”

          STAT+ Exclusive Story

          Already have an account? Log in

          STAT+

          This article is exclusive to STAT+ subscribers

          Unlock this article — and get additional analysis of the technologies disrupting health care — by subscribing to STAT+.

          Already have an account? Log in

          Already have an account? Log in

          Monthly

          $39

          Totals $468 per year

          $39/month Get Started

          Totals $468 per year

          Starter

          $30

          for 3 months, then $39/month

          $30 for 3 months Get Started

          Then $39/month

          Annual

          $399

          Save 15%

          $399/year Get Started

          Save 15%

          11+ Users

          Custom

          Savings start at 25%!

          Request A Quote Request A Quote

          Savings start at 25%!

          2-10 Users

          $300

          Annually per user

          $300/year Get Started

          $300 Annually per user

          View All Plans

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In