<code id='6DF17CE5EE'></code><style id='6DF17CE5EE'></style>
    • <acronym id='6DF17CE5EE'></acronym>
      <center id='6DF17CE5EE'><center id='6DF17CE5EE'><tfoot id='6DF17CE5EE'></tfoot></center><abbr id='6DF17CE5EE'><dir id='6DF17CE5EE'><tfoot id='6DF17CE5EE'></tfoot><noframes id='6DF17CE5EE'>

    • <optgroup id='6DF17CE5EE'><strike id='6DF17CE5EE'><sup id='6DF17CE5EE'></sup></strike><code id='6DF17CE5EE'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='6DF17CE5EE'><label id='6DF17CE5EE'><select id='6DF17CE5EE'><dt id='6DF17CE5EE'><span id='6DF17CE5EE'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='6DF17CE5EE'></u>
          <i id='6DF17CE5EE'><strike id='6DF17CE5EE'><tt id='6DF17CE5EE'><pre id='6DF17CE5EE'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / hotspot / hotspot

          hotspot


          hotspot

          author:Wikipedia    Page View:65586
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In