<code id='4CD5261F34'></code><style id='4CD5261F34'></style>
    • <acronym id='4CD5261F34'></acronym>
      <center id='4CD5261F34'><center id='4CD5261F34'><tfoot id='4CD5261F34'></tfoot></center><abbr id='4CD5261F34'><dir id='4CD5261F34'><tfoot id='4CD5261F34'></tfoot><noframes id='4CD5261F34'>

    • <optgroup id='4CD5261F34'><strike id='4CD5261F34'><sup id='4CD5261F34'></sup></strike><code id='4CD5261F34'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='4CD5261F34'><label id='4CD5261F34'><select id='4CD5261F34'><dt id='4CD5261F34'><span id='4CD5261F34'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='4CD5261F34'></u>
          <i id='4CD5261F34'><strike id='4CD5261F34'><tt id='4CD5261F34'><pre id='4CD5261F34'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / Wikipedia / comprehensive

          comprehensive


          comprehensive

          author:entertainment    Page View:93
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In