<code id='CE42EEDE45'></code><style id='CE42EEDE45'></style>
    • <acronym id='CE42EEDE45'></acronym>
      <center id='CE42EEDE45'><center id='CE42EEDE45'><tfoot id='CE42EEDE45'></tfoot></center><abbr id='CE42EEDE45'><dir id='CE42EEDE45'><tfoot id='CE42EEDE45'></tfoot><noframes id='CE42EEDE45'>

    • <optgroup id='CE42EEDE45'><strike id='CE42EEDE45'><sup id='CE42EEDE45'></sup></strike><code id='CE42EEDE45'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='CE42EEDE45'><label id='CE42EEDE45'><select id='CE42EEDE45'><dt id='CE42EEDE45'><span id='CE42EEDE45'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='CE42EEDE45'></u>
          <i id='CE42EEDE45'><strike id='CE42EEDE45'><tt id='CE42EEDE45'><pre id='CE42EEDE45'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / knowledge / hotspot

          hotspot


          hotspot

          author:hotspot    Page View:5
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In