<code id='6953523D48'></code><style id='6953523D48'></style>
    • <acronym id='6953523D48'></acronym>
      <center id='6953523D48'><center id='6953523D48'><tfoot id='6953523D48'></tfoot></center><abbr id='6953523D48'><dir id='6953523D48'><tfoot id='6953523D48'></tfoot><noframes id='6953523D48'>

    • <optgroup id='6953523D48'><strike id='6953523D48'><sup id='6953523D48'></sup></strike><code id='6953523D48'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='6953523D48'><label id='6953523D48'><select id='6953523D48'><dt id='6953523D48'><span id='6953523D48'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='6953523D48'></u>
          <i id='6953523D48'><strike id='6953523D48'><tt id='6953523D48'><pre id='6953523D48'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / knowledge / leisure time

          leisure time


          leisure time

          author:comprehensive    Page View:32779
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In