<code id='C11F80E556'></code><style id='C11F80E556'></style>
    • <acronym id='C11F80E556'></acronym>
      <center id='C11F80E556'><center id='C11F80E556'><tfoot id='C11F80E556'></tfoot></center><abbr id='C11F80E556'><dir id='C11F80E556'><tfoot id='C11F80E556'></tfoot><noframes id='C11F80E556'>

    • <optgroup id='C11F80E556'><strike id='C11F80E556'><sup id='C11F80E556'></sup></strike><code id='C11F80E556'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='C11F80E556'><label id='C11F80E556'><select id='C11F80E556'><dt id='C11F80E556'><span id='C11F80E556'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='C11F80E556'></u>
          <i id='C11F80E556'><strike id='C11F80E556'><tt id='C11F80E556'><pre id='C11F80E556'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / comprehensive

          comprehensive


          comprehensive

          author:focus    Page View:9231
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In