<code id='179D32BC88'></code><style id='179D32BC88'></style>
    • <acronym id='179D32BC88'></acronym>
      <center id='179D32BC88'><center id='179D32BC88'><tfoot id='179D32BC88'></tfoot></center><abbr id='179D32BC88'><dir id='179D32BC88'><tfoot id='179D32BC88'></tfoot><noframes id='179D32BC88'>

    • <optgroup id='179D32BC88'><strike id='179D32BC88'><sup id='179D32BC88'></sup></strike><code id='179D32BC88'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='179D32BC88'><label id='179D32BC88'><select id='179D32BC88'><dt id='179D32BC88'><span id='179D32BC88'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='179D32BC88'></u>
          <i id='179D32BC88'><strike id='179D32BC88'><tt id='179D32BC88'><pre id='179D32BC88'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / leisure time

          leisure time


          leisure time

          author:entertainment    Page View:19413
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In