<code id='FA873E2814'></code><style id='FA873E2814'></style>
    • <acronym id='FA873E2814'></acronym>
      <center id='FA873E2814'><center id='FA873E2814'><tfoot id='FA873E2814'></tfoot></center><abbr id='FA873E2814'><dir id='FA873E2814'><tfoot id='FA873E2814'></tfoot><noframes id='FA873E2814'>

    • <optgroup id='FA873E2814'><strike id='FA873E2814'><sup id='FA873E2814'></sup></strike><code id='FA873E2814'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='FA873E2814'><label id='FA873E2814'><select id='FA873E2814'><dt id='FA873E2814'><span id='FA873E2814'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='FA873E2814'></u>
          <i id='FA873E2814'><strike id='FA873E2814'><tt id='FA873E2814'><pre id='FA873E2814'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / entertainment / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:fashion    Page View:421
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In