<code id='ECF139640E'></code><style id='ECF139640E'></style>
    • <acronym id='ECF139640E'></acronym>
      <center id='ECF139640E'><center id='ECF139640E'><tfoot id='ECF139640E'></tfoot></center><abbr id='ECF139640E'><dir id='ECF139640E'><tfoot id='ECF139640E'></tfoot><noframes id='ECF139640E'>

    • <optgroup id='ECF139640E'><strike id='ECF139640E'><sup id='ECF139640E'></sup></strike><code id='ECF139640E'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='ECF139640E'><label id='ECF139640E'><select id='ECF139640E'><dt id='ECF139640E'><span id='ECF139640E'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='ECF139640E'></u>
          <i id='ECF139640E'><strike id='ECF139640E'><tt id='ECF139640E'><pre id='ECF139640E'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / Wikipedia / explore

          explore


          explore

          author:fashion    Page View:612
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In