<code id='2148C446AA'></code><style id='2148C446AA'></style>
    • <acronym id='2148C446AA'></acronym>
      <center id='2148C446AA'><center id='2148C446AA'><tfoot id='2148C446AA'></tfoot></center><abbr id='2148C446AA'><dir id='2148C446AA'><tfoot id='2148C446AA'></tfoot><noframes id='2148C446AA'>

    • <optgroup id='2148C446AA'><strike id='2148C446AA'><sup id='2148C446AA'></sup></strike><code id='2148C446AA'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='2148C446AA'><label id='2148C446AA'><select id='2148C446AA'><dt id='2148C446AA'><span id='2148C446AA'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='2148C446AA'></u>
          <i id='2148C446AA'><strike id='2148C446AA'><tt id='2148C446AA'><pre id='2148C446AA'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / hotspot

          hotspot


          hotspot

          author:focus    Page View:3
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In