<code id='D295E28EF7'></code><style id='D295E28EF7'></style>
    • <acronym id='D295E28EF7'></acronym>
      <center id='D295E28EF7'><center id='D295E28EF7'><tfoot id='D295E28EF7'></tfoot></center><abbr id='D295E28EF7'><dir id='D295E28EF7'><tfoot id='D295E28EF7'></tfoot><noframes id='D295E28EF7'>

    • <optgroup id='D295E28EF7'><strike id='D295E28EF7'><sup id='D295E28EF7'></sup></strike><code id='D295E28EF7'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='D295E28EF7'><label id='D295E28EF7'><select id='D295E28EF7'><dt id='D295E28EF7'><span id='D295E28EF7'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='D295E28EF7'></u>
          <i id='D295E28EF7'><strike id='D295E28EF7'><tt id='D295E28EF7'><pre id='D295E28EF7'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / hotspot / hotspot

          hotspot


          hotspot

          author:fashion    Page View:832
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In