<code id='9EB6F9833F'></code><style id='9EB6F9833F'></style>
    • <acronym id='9EB6F9833F'></acronym>
      <center id='9EB6F9833F'><center id='9EB6F9833F'><tfoot id='9EB6F9833F'></tfoot></center><abbr id='9EB6F9833F'><dir id='9EB6F9833F'><tfoot id='9EB6F9833F'></tfoot><noframes id='9EB6F9833F'>

    • <optgroup id='9EB6F9833F'><strike id='9EB6F9833F'><sup id='9EB6F9833F'></sup></strike><code id='9EB6F9833F'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='9EB6F9833F'><label id='9EB6F9833F'><select id='9EB6F9833F'><dt id='9EB6F9833F'><span id='9EB6F9833F'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='9EB6F9833F'></u>
          <i id='9EB6F9833F'><strike id='9EB6F9833F'><tt id='9EB6F9833F'><pre id='9EB6F9833F'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / explore / leisure time

          leisure time


          leisure time

          author:Wikipedia    Page View:63
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In