<code id='5A96570871'></code><style id='5A96570871'></style>
    • <acronym id='5A96570871'></acronym>
      <center id='5A96570871'><center id='5A96570871'><tfoot id='5A96570871'></tfoot></center><abbr id='5A96570871'><dir id='5A96570871'><tfoot id='5A96570871'></tfoot><noframes id='5A96570871'>

    • <optgroup id='5A96570871'><strike id='5A96570871'><sup id='5A96570871'></sup></strike><code id='5A96570871'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='5A96570871'><label id='5A96570871'><select id='5A96570871'><dt id='5A96570871'><span id='5A96570871'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='5A96570871'></u>
          <i id='5A96570871'><strike id='5A96570871'><tt id='5A96570871'><pre id='5A96570871'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / explore / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:focus    Page View:66466
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In