<code id='FD83EF6324'></code><style id='FD83EF6324'></style>
    • <acronym id='FD83EF6324'></acronym>
      <center id='FD83EF6324'><center id='FD83EF6324'><tfoot id='FD83EF6324'></tfoot></center><abbr id='FD83EF6324'><dir id='FD83EF6324'><tfoot id='FD83EF6324'></tfoot><noframes id='FD83EF6324'>

    • <optgroup id='FD83EF6324'><strike id='FD83EF6324'><sup id='FD83EF6324'></sup></strike><code id='FD83EF6324'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='FD83EF6324'><label id='FD83EF6324'><select id='FD83EF6324'><dt id='FD83EF6324'><span id='FD83EF6324'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='FD83EF6324'></u>
          <i id='FD83EF6324'><strike id='FD83EF6324'><tt id='FD83EF6324'><pre id='FD83EF6324'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / entertainment / hotspot

          hotspot


          hotspot

          author:comprehensive    Page View:24976
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In