<code id='B88D154518'></code><style id='B88D154518'></style>
    • <acronym id='B88D154518'></acronym>
      <center id='B88D154518'><center id='B88D154518'><tfoot id='B88D154518'></tfoot></center><abbr id='B88D154518'><dir id='B88D154518'><tfoot id='B88D154518'></tfoot><noframes id='B88D154518'>

    • <optgroup id='B88D154518'><strike id='B88D154518'><sup id='B88D154518'></sup></strike><code id='B88D154518'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='B88D154518'><label id='B88D154518'><select id='B88D154518'><dt id='B88D154518'><span id='B88D154518'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='B88D154518'></u>
          <i id='B88D154518'><strike id='B88D154518'><tt id='B88D154518'><pre id='B88D154518'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / hotspot / comprehensive

          comprehensive


          comprehensive

          author:focus    Page View:8
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In