<code id='EA07182D52'></code><style id='EA07182D52'></style>
    • <acronym id='EA07182D52'></acronym>
      <center id='EA07182D52'><center id='EA07182D52'><tfoot id='EA07182D52'></tfoot></center><abbr id='EA07182D52'><dir id='EA07182D52'><tfoot id='EA07182D52'></tfoot><noframes id='EA07182D52'>

    • <optgroup id='EA07182D52'><strike id='EA07182D52'><sup id='EA07182D52'></sup></strike><code id='EA07182D52'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='EA07182D52'><label id='EA07182D52'><select id='EA07182D52'><dt id='EA07182D52'><span id='EA07182D52'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='EA07182D52'></u>
          <i id='EA07182D52'><strike id='EA07182D52'><tt id='EA07182D52'><pre id='EA07182D52'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / Wikipedia / knowledge

          knowledge


          knowledge

          author:hotspot    Page View:621
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In