<code id='250AED5982'></code><style id='250AED5982'></style>
    • <acronym id='250AED5982'></acronym>
      <center id='250AED5982'><center id='250AED5982'><tfoot id='250AED5982'></tfoot></center><abbr id='250AED5982'><dir id='250AED5982'><tfoot id='250AED5982'></tfoot><noframes id='250AED5982'>

    • <optgroup id='250AED5982'><strike id='250AED5982'><sup id='250AED5982'></sup></strike><code id='250AED5982'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='250AED5982'><label id='250AED5982'><select id='250AED5982'><dt id='250AED5982'><span id='250AED5982'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='250AED5982'></u>
          <i id='250AED5982'><strike id='250AED5982'><tt id='250AED5982'><pre id='250AED5982'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / Wikipedia / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:leisure time    Page View:238
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In