<code id='BA7167CD35'></code><style id='BA7167CD35'></style>
    • <acronym id='BA7167CD35'></acronym>
      <center id='BA7167CD35'><center id='BA7167CD35'><tfoot id='BA7167CD35'></tfoot></center><abbr id='BA7167CD35'><dir id='BA7167CD35'><tfoot id='BA7167CD35'></tfoot><noframes id='BA7167CD35'>

    • <optgroup id='BA7167CD35'><strike id='BA7167CD35'><sup id='BA7167CD35'></sup></strike><code id='BA7167CD35'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='BA7167CD35'><label id='BA7167CD35'><select id='BA7167CD35'><dt id='BA7167CD35'><span id='BA7167CD35'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='BA7167CD35'></u>
          <i id='BA7167CD35'><strike id='BA7167CD35'><tt id='BA7167CD35'><pre id='BA7167CD35'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / entertainment / leisure time

          leisure time


          leisure time

          author:leisure time    Page View:59799
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In