<code id='0CF3B119BF'></code><style id='0CF3B119BF'></style>
    • <acronym id='0CF3B119BF'></acronym>
      <center id='0CF3B119BF'><center id='0CF3B119BF'><tfoot id='0CF3B119BF'></tfoot></center><abbr id='0CF3B119BF'><dir id='0CF3B119BF'><tfoot id='0CF3B119BF'></tfoot><noframes id='0CF3B119BF'>

    • <optgroup id='0CF3B119BF'><strike id='0CF3B119BF'><sup id='0CF3B119BF'></sup></strike><code id='0CF3B119BF'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='0CF3B119BF'><label id='0CF3B119BF'><select id='0CF3B119BF'><dt id='0CF3B119BF'><span id='0CF3B119BF'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='0CF3B119BF'></u>
          <i id='0CF3B119BF'><strike id='0CF3B119BF'><tt id='0CF3B119BF'><pre id='0CF3B119BF'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / explore

          explore


          explore

          author:knowledge    Page View:44
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In