<code id='17C7F87846'></code><style id='17C7F87846'></style>
    • <acronym id='17C7F87846'></acronym>
      <center id='17C7F87846'><center id='17C7F87846'><tfoot id='17C7F87846'></tfoot></center><abbr id='17C7F87846'><dir id='17C7F87846'><tfoot id='17C7F87846'></tfoot><noframes id='17C7F87846'>

    • <optgroup id='17C7F87846'><strike id='17C7F87846'><sup id='17C7F87846'></sup></strike><code id='17C7F87846'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='17C7F87846'><label id='17C7F87846'><select id='17C7F87846'><dt id='17C7F87846'><span id='17C7F87846'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='17C7F87846'></u>
          <i id='17C7F87846'><strike id='17C7F87846'><tt id='17C7F87846'><pre id='17C7F87846'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / entertainment / comprehensive

          comprehensive


          comprehensive

          author:knowledge    Page View:837
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In