<code id='12FFB52F1E'></code><style id='12FFB52F1E'></style>
    • <acronym id='12FFB52F1E'></acronym>
      <center id='12FFB52F1E'><center id='12FFB52F1E'><tfoot id='12FFB52F1E'></tfoot></center><abbr id='12FFB52F1E'><dir id='12FFB52F1E'><tfoot id='12FFB52F1E'></tfoot><noframes id='12FFB52F1E'>

    • <optgroup id='12FFB52F1E'><strike id='12FFB52F1E'><sup id='12FFB52F1E'></sup></strike><code id='12FFB52F1E'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='12FFB52F1E'><label id='12FFB52F1E'><select id='12FFB52F1E'><dt id='12FFB52F1E'><span id='12FFB52F1E'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='12FFB52F1E'></u>
          <i id='12FFB52F1E'><strike id='12FFB52F1E'><tt id='12FFB52F1E'><pre id='12FFB52F1E'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / explore / comprehensive

          comprehensive


          comprehensive

          author:entertainment    Page View:27766
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In