<code id='D34153623B'></code><style id='D34153623B'></style>
    • <acronym id='D34153623B'></acronym>
      <center id='D34153623B'><center id='D34153623B'><tfoot id='D34153623B'></tfoot></center><abbr id='D34153623B'><dir id='D34153623B'><tfoot id='D34153623B'></tfoot><noframes id='D34153623B'>

    • <optgroup id='D34153623B'><strike id='D34153623B'><sup id='D34153623B'></sup></strike><code id='D34153623B'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='D34153623B'><label id='D34153623B'><select id='D34153623B'><dt id='D34153623B'><span id='D34153623B'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='D34153623B'></u>
          <i id='D34153623B'><strike id='D34153623B'><tt id='D34153623B'><pre id='D34153623B'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:leisure time    Page View:54
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In