<code id='19339439FE'></code><style id='19339439FE'></style>
    • <acronym id='19339439FE'></acronym>
      <center id='19339439FE'><center id='19339439FE'><tfoot id='19339439FE'></tfoot></center><abbr id='19339439FE'><dir id='19339439FE'><tfoot id='19339439FE'></tfoot><noframes id='19339439FE'>

    • <optgroup id='19339439FE'><strike id='19339439FE'><sup id='19339439FE'></sup></strike><code id='19339439FE'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='19339439FE'><label id='19339439FE'><select id='19339439FE'><dt id='19339439FE'><span id='19339439FE'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='19339439FE'></u>
          <i id='19339439FE'><strike id='19339439FE'><tt id='19339439FE'><pre id='19339439FE'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / comprehensive

          comprehensive


          comprehensive

          author:explore    Page View:97
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In