<code id='11BC62D74C'></code><style id='11BC62D74C'></style>
    • <acronym id='11BC62D74C'></acronym>
      <center id='11BC62D74C'><center id='11BC62D74C'><tfoot id='11BC62D74C'></tfoot></center><abbr id='11BC62D74C'><dir id='11BC62D74C'><tfoot id='11BC62D74C'></tfoot><noframes id='11BC62D74C'>

    • <optgroup id='11BC62D74C'><strike id='11BC62D74C'><sup id='11BC62D74C'></sup></strike><code id='11BC62D74C'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='11BC62D74C'><label id='11BC62D74C'><select id='11BC62D74C'><dt id='11BC62D74C'><span id='11BC62D74C'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='11BC62D74C'></u>
          <i id='11BC62D74C'><strike id='11BC62D74C'><tt id='11BC62D74C'><pre id='11BC62D74C'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / fashion / knowledge

          knowledge


          knowledge

          author:hotspot    Page View:18564
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In