<code id='9DD4585C57'></code><style id='9DD4585C57'></style>
    • <acronym id='9DD4585C57'></acronym>
      <center id='9DD4585C57'><center id='9DD4585C57'><tfoot id='9DD4585C57'></tfoot></center><abbr id='9DD4585C57'><dir id='9DD4585C57'><tfoot id='9DD4585C57'></tfoot><noframes id='9DD4585C57'>

    • <optgroup id='9DD4585C57'><strike id='9DD4585C57'><sup id='9DD4585C57'></sup></strike><code id='9DD4585C57'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='9DD4585C57'><label id='9DD4585C57'><select id='9DD4585C57'><dt id='9DD4585C57'><span id='9DD4585C57'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='9DD4585C57'></u>
          <i id='9DD4585C57'><strike id='9DD4585C57'><tt id='9DD4585C57'><pre id='9DD4585C57'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / hotspot / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:hotspot    Page View:5577
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In