<code id='D85546E4C0'></code><style id='D85546E4C0'></style>
    • <acronym id='D85546E4C0'></acronym>
      <center id='D85546E4C0'><center id='D85546E4C0'><tfoot id='D85546E4C0'></tfoot></center><abbr id='D85546E4C0'><dir id='D85546E4C0'><tfoot id='D85546E4C0'></tfoot><noframes id='D85546E4C0'>

    • <optgroup id='D85546E4C0'><strike id='D85546E4C0'><sup id='D85546E4C0'></sup></strike><code id='D85546E4C0'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='D85546E4C0'><label id='D85546E4C0'><select id='D85546E4C0'><dt id='D85546E4C0'><span id='D85546E4C0'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='D85546E4C0'></u>
          <i id='D85546E4C0'><strike id='D85546E4C0'><tt id='D85546E4C0'><pre id='D85546E4C0'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:comprehensive    Page View:77472
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In