<code id='C5D1F60EEC'></code><style id='C5D1F60EEC'></style>
    • <acronym id='C5D1F60EEC'></acronym>
      <center id='C5D1F60EEC'><center id='C5D1F60EEC'><tfoot id='C5D1F60EEC'></tfoot></center><abbr id='C5D1F60EEC'><dir id='C5D1F60EEC'><tfoot id='C5D1F60EEC'></tfoot><noframes id='C5D1F60EEC'>

    • <optgroup id='C5D1F60EEC'><strike id='C5D1F60EEC'><sup id='C5D1F60EEC'></sup></strike><code id='C5D1F60EEC'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='C5D1F60EEC'><label id='C5D1F60EEC'><select id='C5D1F60EEC'><dt id='C5D1F60EEC'><span id='C5D1F60EEC'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='C5D1F60EEC'></u>
          <i id='C5D1F60EEC'><strike id='C5D1F60EEC'><tt id='C5D1F60EEC'><pre id='C5D1F60EEC'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / hotspot

          hotspot


          hotspot

          author:fashion    Page View:394
          Adam's take main illustration
          Molly Ferguson/STAT

          The approval Friday of Bluebird Bio’s gene therapy for sickle cell disease should have been a momentum-swinging achievement for the long-struggling biotech. Instead, the company mispriced its new drug and fumbled a pivotal financial lifeline.

          The consequences of these strategic blunders — arguably, self-inflicted — could imperil Bluebird’s independence, perhaps even its survival.

          advertisement

          Bluebird priced Lyfgenia at $3.1 million, while Vertex Pharmaceutical set the cost of Casgevy, its competing sickle cell treatment also approved on Friday, at $2.2 million. Not only is Lyfgenia significantly more expensive, but its prescribing label carries a “black box” safety warning, which requires patients undergo regular blood monitoring for cancer risk. Casgevy has no similar monitoring requirement.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In