<code id='714EFEA782'></code><style id='714EFEA782'></style>
    • <acronym id='714EFEA782'></acronym>
      <center id='714EFEA782'><center id='714EFEA782'><tfoot id='714EFEA782'></tfoot></center><abbr id='714EFEA782'><dir id='714EFEA782'><tfoot id='714EFEA782'></tfoot><noframes id='714EFEA782'>

    • <optgroup id='714EFEA782'><strike id='714EFEA782'><sup id='714EFEA782'></sup></strike><code id='714EFEA782'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='714EFEA782'><label id='714EFEA782'><select id='714EFEA782'><dt id='714EFEA782'><span id='714EFEA782'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='714EFEA782'></u>
          <i id='714EFEA782'><strike id='714EFEA782'><tt id='714EFEA782'><pre id='714EFEA782'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:entertainment    Page View:265
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In