<code id='30AB8FF732'></code><style id='30AB8FF732'></style>
    • <acronym id='30AB8FF732'></acronym>
      <center id='30AB8FF732'><center id='30AB8FF732'><tfoot id='30AB8FF732'></tfoot></center><abbr id='30AB8FF732'><dir id='30AB8FF732'><tfoot id='30AB8FF732'></tfoot><noframes id='30AB8FF732'>

    • <optgroup id='30AB8FF732'><strike id='30AB8FF732'><sup id='30AB8FF732'></sup></strike><code id='30AB8FF732'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='30AB8FF732'><label id='30AB8FF732'><select id='30AB8FF732'><dt id='30AB8FF732'><span id='30AB8FF732'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='30AB8FF732'></u>
          <i id='30AB8FF732'><strike id='30AB8FF732'><tt id='30AB8FF732'><pre id='30AB8FF732'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:Wikipedia    Page View:95486
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In