<code id='01CA53CF96'></code><style id='01CA53CF96'></style>
    • <acronym id='01CA53CF96'></acronym>
      <center id='01CA53CF96'><center id='01CA53CF96'><tfoot id='01CA53CF96'></tfoot></center><abbr id='01CA53CF96'><dir id='01CA53CF96'><tfoot id='01CA53CF96'></tfoot><noframes id='01CA53CF96'>

    • <optgroup id='01CA53CF96'><strike id='01CA53CF96'><sup id='01CA53CF96'></sup></strike><code id='01CA53CF96'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='01CA53CF96'><label id='01CA53CF96'><select id='01CA53CF96'><dt id='01CA53CF96'><span id='01CA53CF96'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='01CA53CF96'></u>
          <i id='01CA53CF96'><strike id='01CA53CF96'><tt id='01CA53CF96'><pre id='01CA53CF96'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / Wikipedia / knowledge

          knowledge


          knowledge

          author:entertainment    Page View:9
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In