<code id='5FD43B965A'></code><style id='5FD43B965A'></style>
    • <acronym id='5FD43B965A'></acronym>
      <center id='5FD43B965A'><center id='5FD43B965A'><tfoot id='5FD43B965A'></tfoot></center><abbr id='5FD43B965A'><dir id='5FD43B965A'><tfoot id='5FD43B965A'></tfoot><noframes id='5FD43B965A'>

    • <optgroup id='5FD43B965A'><strike id='5FD43B965A'><sup id='5FD43B965A'></sup></strike><code id='5FD43B965A'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='5FD43B965A'><label id='5FD43B965A'><select id='5FD43B965A'><dt id='5FD43B965A'><span id='5FD43B965A'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='5FD43B965A'></u>
          <i id='5FD43B965A'><strike id='5FD43B965A'><tt id='5FD43B965A'><pre id='5FD43B965A'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / fashion / comprehensive

          comprehensive


          comprehensive

          author:focus    Page View:7219
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In