<code id='20A5AC6488'></code><style id='20A5AC6488'></style>
    • <acronym id='20A5AC6488'></acronym>
      <center id='20A5AC6488'><center id='20A5AC6488'><tfoot id='20A5AC6488'></tfoot></center><abbr id='20A5AC6488'><dir id='20A5AC6488'><tfoot id='20A5AC6488'></tfoot><noframes id='20A5AC6488'>

    • <optgroup id='20A5AC6488'><strike id='20A5AC6488'><sup id='20A5AC6488'></sup></strike><code id='20A5AC6488'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='20A5AC6488'><label id='20A5AC6488'><select id='20A5AC6488'><dt id='20A5AC6488'><span id='20A5AC6488'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='20A5AC6488'></u>
          <i id='20A5AC6488'><strike id='20A5AC6488'><tt id='20A5AC6488'><pre id='20A5AC6488'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / entertainment / knowledge

          knowledge


          knowledge

          author:comprehensive    Page View:32
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In