<code id='CFFEAC2841'></code><style id='CFFEAC2841'></style>
    • <acronym id='CFFEAC2841'></acronym>
      <center id='CFFEAC2841'><center id='CFFEAC2841'><tfoot id='CFFEAC2841'></tfoot></center><abbr id='CFFEAC2841'><dir id='CFFEAC2841'><tfoot id='CFFEAC2841'></tfoot><noframes id='CFFEAC2841'>

    • <optgroup id='CFFEAC2841'><strike id='CFFEAC2841'><sup id='CFFEAC2841'></sup></strike><code id='CFFEAC2841'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='CFFEAC2841'><label id='CFFEAC2841'><select id='CFFEAC2841'><dt id='CFFEAC2841'><span id='CFFEAC2841'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='CFFEAC2841'></u>
          <i id='CFFEAC2841'><strike id='CFFEAC2841'><tt id='CFFEAC2841'><pre id='CFFEAC2841'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / knowledge / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:entertainment    Page View:878
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In