<code id='136BB3720F'></code><style id='136BB3720F'></style>
    • <acronym id='136BB3720F'></acronym>
      <center id='136BB3720F'><center id='136BB3720F'><tfoot id='136BB3720F'></tfoot></center><abbr id='136BB3720F'><dir id='136BB3720F'><tfoot id='136BB3720F'></tfoot><noframes id='136BB3720F'>

    • <optgroup id='136BB3720F'><strike id='136BB3720F'><sup id='136BB3720F'></sup></strike><code id='136BB3720F'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='136BB3720F'><label id='136BB3720F'><select id='136BB3720F'><dt id='136BB3720F'><span id='136BB3720F'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='136BB3720F'></u>
          <i id='136BB3720F'><strike id='136BB3720F'><tt id='136BB3720F'><pre id='136BB3720F'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / Wikipedia / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:focus    Page View:85156
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In