<code id='61100A82B7'></code><style id='61100A82B7'></style>
    • <acronym id='61100A82B7'></acronym>
      <center id='61100A82B7'><center id='61100A82B7'><tfoot id='61100A82B7'></tfoot></center><abbr id='61100A82B7'><dir id='61100A82B7'><tfoot id='61100A82B7'></tfoot><noframes id='61100A82B7'>

    • <optgroup id='61100A82B7'><strike id='61100A82B7'><sup id='61100A82B7'></sup></strike><code id='61100A82B7'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='61100A82B7'><label id='61100A82B7'><select id='61100A82B7'><dt id='61100A82B7'><span id='61100A82B7'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='61100A82B7'></u>
          <i id='61100A82B7'><strike id='61100A82B7'><tt id='61100A82B7'><pre id='61100A82B7'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / comprehensive / focus

          focus


          focus

          author:focus    Page View:2432
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In