<code id='5F19EFECE5'></code><style id='5F19EFECE5'></style>
    • <acronym id='5F19EFECE5'></acronym>
      <center id='5F19EFECE5'><center id='5F19EFECE5'><tfoot id='5F19EFECE5'></tfoot></center><abbr id='5F19EFECE5'><dir id='5F19EFECE5'><tfoot id='5F19EFECE5'></tfoot><noframes id='5F19EFECE5'>

    • <optgroup id='5F19EFECE5'><strike id='5F19EFECE5'><sup id='5F19EFECE5'></sup></strike><code id='5F19EFECE5'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='5F19EFECE5'><label id='5F19EFECE5'><select id='5F19EFECE5'><dt id='5F19EFECE5'><span id='5F19EFECE5'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='5F19EFECE5'></u>
          <i id='5F19EFECE5'><strike id='5F19EFECE5'><tt id='5F19EFECE5'><pre id='5F19EFECE5'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          Home / entertainment / knowledge

          knowledge


          knowledge

          author:focus    Page View:3697
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In